Sometimes Late Is Better Than Never: Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator Years after an Acute Myocardial Infarction - Case Report

Sustained ventricular arrhythmias that occur early post-myocardial infarction (MI) are generally considered epiphenomena of the MI and are not consistently associated with long-term prognosis. The lack of association with long-term prognosis is more clearly established for early ventricular fibrillation (VF) and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT). Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT), even when it occurs early, however, may reflect a permanent arrhythmic substrate1. Patients with COVID-19 have a high risk of thromboembolic events, and the virus has also been shown to have extensive effects on the cardiovascular system2,3,4. A 62-year-old woman, recently hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, was brought to the emergency department with pulseless SMVT having been successfully resuscitated in the prehospital setting. The patient has a history of an old MI treated with thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that was complicated with early SMVT, but with preserved left ventricular function and without heart failure. The patient underwent implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). During the hospitalization, she developed dyspnea and was diagnosed with minor pulmonary embolism. It may be appropriate to consider early SMVT as a predictor of adverse late outcomes that would necessitate rigorous follow-up and maybe an early invasive primary prevention strategy. This case also reflects the possibility of long-term cardiac involvement and increased thromboembolic risk in patients recovering from COVID-19. © 2022 Maria Zamfirescu et al., published by Sciendo.

Pathophysiology of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19

Introduction and aim. A small number of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) develop thromboembolism (arterial or venous), both micro- and macrovascular complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary arterial thrombosis. The objective of the study is to describe the pathophysiology of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. Material and methods. In this article a narrative review regarding pathophysiology of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. Analysis of the literature. The development of coagulopathy is a consequence of the intense inflammatory response associated with hypercoagulability, platelet activation, and endothelial dysfunction. The pathophysiology that relates pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) with COVID-19 is associated with a hypercoagulable state. PTE is suspected in hospitalized patients presenting dyspnea, decreased oxygen requirement, hemodynamic instability, and dissociation between hemodynamic and respiratory changes. In COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, initially, patients present with elevated levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer, with minimal changes in prothrombin time and platelet count. The main risk factor for the development of pulmonary embolism is the increase in D-dimer that is associated with the development of PTE. The administration of iodine-based contrast agent to patients with COVID-19 would affect P-creatinine and renal function, where Ultrasound is viewed as cost-effective and highly portable, can be performed at the bedside. Conclusion. Acute respiratory distress syndrome severity in patients with COVID-19 can explain PTE as a consequence of an exaggerated immune response. © 2022 Publishing Office of the University of Rzeszow. All Rights Reserved.

Coagulation Abnormalities in Patients with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease. Bilateral pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulation activation have been described as key features of severe COVID-19. Fibrinogen and D-dimer are typically increased. Moreover, the risk for venous thromboembolism is markedly increased, especially in patients in the intensive care unit, often despite prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. Pulmonary microvascular thrombosis has also been described and the risk for arterial thrombotic diseases also appears to be increased. Bleeding is less common than thrombosis but can occur. Evaluation for venous thromboembolism may be challenging because symptoms of pulmonary embolism overlap with COVID-19, and imaging studies may not be feasible in all cases. All inpatients should receive thromboprophylaxis unless contraindicated. In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, prophylactic dosing rather than more intensive (intermediate or therapeutic) dosing are suggested. On the other hand, therapeutic dose of anticoagulation is always appropriate to treat deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, unless contraindicated. This article reviews evaluation and management of coagulation abnormalities in individuals with COVID-19. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Three Years of COVID-19 Pandemic—Is the Heart Skipping a Beat?

In the context of new therapeutic protocols and vaccines developed in the past 3 years, coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) continues to exert an important impact on the healthcare systems worldwide. Age and a history of cardiovascular or respiratory diseases remain relevant in terms of prognosis for all COVID-19 patients, independent of the viral strain, by conveying a worse outcome and increased rates of in-hospital mortality. Previous studies reported heterogenous cardiovascular manifestations in COVID-19 patients from acute myocarditis or myopericarditis, acute coronary syndromes, stress cardiomyopathy, de novo arrhythmias to pulmonary embolism, or in some rare cases, endocarditis. In this review, we assessed the potential acute, in-hospital and long-term cardiac complications in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of COVID is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Does COVID-19 vaccination protect against pulmonary embolism?

The prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in COVID-19 patients is highly variable, depending on methodological and clinical factors, among which vaccination (1). The hypothesis of a possible protective role of vaccination in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients has not been explored. The aim of the study was to evaluate PE prevalence in vaccinated versus unvaccinated hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We conducted a retrospective case-control study from 2021/11/01 to 2022/01/15; we reviewed all the chest computed topographies (chest-CT) performed because of a clinical suspicion for PE at our Institution. Sixty-two patients were included in the study: 27/62 (43.5%) were vaccinated and 35/62 (56.4%) were not. Vaccinated patients were older and with more comorbidities than unvaccinated people. Overall, PE was diagnosed in 19/62 patients (30.1% prevalence). CT Severity Score (CT-SS) differs between the two groups; not vaccinated patients had a more severe CT imaging than the vaccinated (< 0.00005). PE prevalence in ICU was 43.2% (16/37 patients), while in the Internal Medicine ward, it was 12% (3/25 cases). PE was significantly higher among unvaccinated people: 16/35 (45.7%) vs 3/27 (11.1%), OR p = 0.04. We observed a strong association between vaccination and protection from PE in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: morbidity was significantly lower in vaccinated versus not vaccinated patients. The issue of the protective role of vaccination in COVID-19-associated VTE should be addressed in adequately designed and powered future prospective studies.

A Quest to Find the Aetiology of Pulmonary Embolism Beyond the Common: A Case of Dyshypofibrinogenemia Presenting as Pulmonary Embolism.

Hypodysfibrinogenemia-related thromboembolic disorder is a rarely encountered clinical entity. We present such a case of a 34-year-old lady with no known co-morbidities presenting to the accident and emergency unit with left-sided pleuritic chest pain associated with non-productive cough and breathlessness. Laboratory tests revealed fibrinogen level of 0.42 g/l (1.5-4g/l) with prolonged prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) along with elevated d-dimer, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and troponin. CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) found bilateral pulmonary embolism with right heart strain. Functional/antigenic fibrinogen ratio was 0.38. Genetic testing eventually revealed a heterozygous missense mutation in exon 8-p.1055G>C; p.Cys352Ser in the sequencing of the fibrinogen gene FGG (gamma chain) confirming the diagnosis of dyshypofibrinogenemia. She was treated with anticoagulants with fibrinogen replacement therapy and later discharged on apixaban.

Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulant Therapy in COVID-19-Related Pulmonary Embolism with Different Extension.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its incidence is highly variable. The aim of our study was to describe the radiological and clinical presentations, as well as the therapeutic management, of PEs that occurred during SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of hospitalized patients. In this observational study, we enrolled patients with moderate COVID-19 who developed PE during hospitalization. Clinical, laboratory, and radiological features were recorded. PE was diagnosed on clinical suspicion and/or CT angiography. According to CT angiography results, two groups of patients were further distinguished: those with proximal or central pulmonary embolism (cPE) and those with distal or micro-pulmonary embolism (mPE). A total of 56 patients with a mean age of 78 ± 15 years were included. Overall, PE occurred after a median of 2 days from hospitalization (range 0-47 days) and, interestingly, the majority of them (89%) within the first 10 days of hospitalization, without differences between the groups. Patients with cPE were younger (p = 0.02), with a lower creatinine clearance (p = 0.04), and tended to have a higher body weight (p = 0.059) and higher D-Dimer values (p = 0.059) than patients with mPE. In all patients, low-weight molecular heparin (LWMH) at anticoagulant dosage was promptly started as soon as PE was diagnosed. After a mean of 16 ± 9 days, 94% of patients with cPE were switched to oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, which was a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 86% of cases. In contrast, only in 68% of patients with mPE, the prosecution with OAC was indicated. The duration of treatment was at least 3 months from PE diagnosis in all patients who started OAC. At the 3-month follow-up, no persistence or recurrence of PE as well as no clinically relevant bleedings were found in both groups. In conclusion, pulmonary embolism in patients with SARS-CoV-2 may have different extensions. Used with clinical judgment, oral anticoagulant therapy with DOAC was effective and safe.

[Pulmonary CT angiography in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: comparison between patients with and without infection and with a pre-pandemic series]. / Angio-TC pulmonar durante la pandemia de COVID-19: comparación en pacientes con y sin la infección y con una serie prepandémica.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To analyze the diagnostic performance of pulmonary CT angiography and to compare different D-dimer cutoffs for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive pulmonary CT angiography studies done for suspected pulmonary embolism in a tertiary hospital during two time periods: the first December 2020 through February 2021 and the second December 2017 through February 2018.D-dimer levels were obtained less than 24 hours before the pulmonary CT angiography studies. We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and pattern of pulmonary embolism for six different values of D-dimer and the extent of the embolism. During the pandemic period, we also analyzed whether the patients had COVID-19. RESULTS: After excluding 29 poor-quality studies, 492 studies were analyzed; 352 of these were done during the pandemic, 180 in patients with COVID-19 and 172 in patients without COVID-19.The absolute frequency of pulmonary embolism diagnosed was higher during the pandemic period (34 cases during the prior period and 85 during the pandemic; 47 of these patients had COVID-19). No significant differences were found in comparing the AUCs for the D-dimer values. The optimum values calculated for the receiver operating characteristic curves differed between patients with COVID-19 (2200 mcg/L), without COVID-19 (4800 mcg/L), and diagnosed in the prepandemic period (3200 mcg/L).Peripheral distribution of the emboli was more common in patients with COVID-19 (72%) than in those without COVID-19 and than in those diagnosed before the pandemic [OR 6.6, 95% CI:1.5‒24.6, p<0.05 when compared to central distribution]. CONCLUSIONS: The number of CT angiography studies and the number of pulmonary embolisms diagnosed during the pandemic increased due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The optimal D-dimer cutoffs and the distribution of the pulmonary embolisms differed between the groups of patients with and without COVID-19.

Changing face of pulmonary embolism with COVID-19.

AIM: This study aimed to describe the baseline characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with pulmonary embolism, and to examine the Geneva score, pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI), radiological and biochemical findings. METHODS: From March 2020 to June 2021, the files of 41 COVID-19 patients with pulmonary embolism were accessed. RESULTS: Mean D-dimer value was 6.04 mg/dl and 61% of the patients received at least one dose of anticoagulant treatment. In patients receiving deep venous thrombosis prophlaxis, an optimal D-dimer cut-off point was calculated as 5.69 mg/dl. The area under the curve was 0.753 (p = 0.007; sensivity 64%; specificity 62.5%). The mean Geneva score was 4.31, mean PESI was 72.48 and mean Qanadli score was 11.29. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, traditional clinical predictive scores had little discriminatory power in these patients, and a higher D-dimer cut-off value should be considered to better diagnose patients for pulmonary embolism.

Massive pulmonary embolism led to cardiac arrest two days after thoracoscopy in a young male with pleural tuberculosis.

TB itself is considered an independent risk factor for VTE; however, developing pulmonary embolism after medical thoracoscopy is extremely rare. Herein, we describe a 30-year-old previously healthy male with pleural tuberculosis developed a massive pulmonary embolism with subsequent cardiac arrest after a diagnostic medical thoracoscopy. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) showed major right pulmonary embolism (PE). Unfortunately, the patient passed away despite resuscitation and extensive organ support in the intensive care unit (ICU). This case highlights the thrombotic risk in this population group in order to avoid such devastating complications.

Effects on Right Ventricular Function One Year after COVID-19-Related Pulmonary Embolism.

The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of subclinical cardiac dysfunction in recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, who were stratified according to a previous diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) as a complication of COVID-19 pneumonia. Out of 68 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia followed up for one year, 44 patients (mean age 58.4 ± 13.3, 70% males) without known cardiopulmonary disease were divided in two groups (PE+ and PE-, each comprising 22 patients) and underwent clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic examination, including right-ventricle global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS), and RV free wall longitudinal strain (RV-FWLS). While no significant differences were found in the left- or right-heart chambers' dimensions between the two study groups, the PE+ patients showed a significant reduction in RV-GLS (-16.4 ± 2.9 vs. -21.6 ± 4.3%, p < 0.001) and RV-FWLS (-18.9 ± 4 vs. -24.6 ± 5.12%, p < 0.001) values compared to the PE- patients. According to the ROC-curve analysis, RV-FWLS < 21% was the best cut-off with which to predict PE diagnosis in patients after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (sensitivity 74%, specificity 89%, area under the curve = 0.819, p < 0.001). According to the multivariate logistic regression model, RV-FWLS < 21% was independently associated with PE (HR 34.96, 95% CI:3.24-377.09, p = 0.003) and obesity (HR 10.34, 95% CI:1.05-101.68, p = 0.045). In conclusion, in recovered COVID-19 patients with a history of PE+, there is a persistence of subclinical RV dysfunction one year after the acute phase of the disease, detectable by a significant impairment in RV-GLS and RV-FWLS. A reduction in RV-FWLS of lower than 21% is independently associated with COVID-related PE.

Saddle pulmonary embolism in the setting of COVID-19 infection: A systematic review of case reports and case series.

Saddle pulmonary embolism (SPE) is a rare type of pulmonary embolism that can lead to hemodynamic compromise causing sudden deaths. Due to a dearth of large prospective studies in this area, little is known regarding the epidemiology, and prognosis and factors affecting the latter for COVID-19-associated SPE. We aimed to describe COVID-19-associated SPE and quantify and compare mortality and factors affecting mortality among the cases. We included a total of 25 publications with a total of 35 cases. The average age was 45 ± 16.3 years with 11 females and 24 males. Dyspnoea (82.5%), orthopnoea (43.5%), and cough (43.5%) were the most common symptoms, and obstructive shock was present in five (21.7%) patients. The average reported oxygen (O2) saturation was 85.8% ± 11.9 mm Hg. Hypertension (26.1%), diabetes (21.7%), and deep vein thrombosis (21.7%) were the most commonly reported comorbidities. Right heart strain was recognized in seven (30%) patients on electroencephalogram (S1QIIITIII) and 12 (52.2%) patients on echocardiogram. Anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and percutaneous intervention were tried in 21 (91.3%), 13 (56.5%), and 6 (26.1%) cases, respectively. Despite the aggressive management, 2 of 25 (8.7%) patients died in our smaller case report cohort. We conclude that despite aggressive management modalities, the mortality of SPE remains high in COVID-19.

Fondaparinux Sodium: Recent Advances in the Management of Thrombosis.

Fondaparinux sodium is a chemically synthesized selective factor Xa inhibitor approved for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events, that is, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and superficial vein thrombosis, in acutely ill (including those affected by COVID-19 or cancer patients) and those undergoing surgeries. Since its approval in 2002, the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux is well demonstrated by many clinical studies, establishing the value of fondaparinux in clinical practice. Some of the advantages with fondaparinux are its chemical nature of synthesis, minimal risk of contamination, 100% absolute bioavailability subcutaneously, instant onset of action, a long half-life, direct renal excretion, fewer adverse reactions when compared with direct oral anticoagulants, and being an ideal alternative in conditions where oral anticoagulants are not approved for use or in patients intolerant to low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). In the last decade, the real-world use of fondaparinux has been explored in other conditions such as acute coronary syndromes, bariatric surgery, in patients developing vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) and in pregnant women with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), or those intolerant to LMWH. The emerging data from these studies have culminated in recent updates in the guidelines that recommend the use of fondaparinux under various conditions. This paper aims to review the recent data and the subsequent updates in the recommendations of various guidelines on the use of fondaparinux sodium.

Pulmonary embolism at CT pulmonary angiography in patients with COVID-19 at a tertiary care center in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began to spread in December 2019 and was declared a pandemic by WHO on 11 March 2020. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a known sequel to COVID-19 infection. Many patients showed worsened symptoms of thrombotic events of pulmonary arteries during the second week of the disease for which computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is recommended. The most frequent complications in critically ill patients are prothrombotic coagulation abnormalities and thromboembolism. So, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of PE in patients with COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relation to disease severity on CTPA findings. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and underwent CTPA. COVID-19 infection in participants was confirmed by a PCR of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab samples. Frequencies of computed tomography severity scores and CTPA were calculated and compared with clinical and laboratory findings. Results: The study included 92 patients with COVID-19 infection. Positive PE was found in 18.5% of the patients. The mean age of the patients was 59.83±13.58 years with an age range of 30-86 years. Among the total participants, 27.2% underwent ventilation, 19.6% died during treatment, and 80.4% of them got discharged. PE was developed in patients who did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation, which is statistically significant (P≤0.001). There was also a significant relationship between mechanical ventilation and CTPA findings. Conclusions: The authors conclude from their study that PE is one of the complications of COVID-19 infection. Rising D-dimer during the second week of disease alerts clinicians to do CTPA to exclude or confirm PE. This will help in the early diagnosis and treatment of PE.

Venous thromboembolism secondary to hospitalization for COVID-19: patient management and long-term outcomes.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. Little information is available on long-term outcomes of VTE in this population. Objectives: We aimed to compare the characteristics, management strategies, and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with COVID-19-associated VTE and patients with VTE provoked by hospitalization for other acute medical illnesses. Methods: This is an observational cohort study, with a prospective cohort of 278 patients with COVID-19-associated VTE enrolled between 2020 and 2021 and a comparison cohort of 300 patients without COVID-19 enrolled in the ongoing START2-Register between 2018 and 2020. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, other indications to anticoagulant treatment, active cancer, recent (<3 months) major surgery, trauma, pregnancy, and participation in interventional studies. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months after treatment discontinuation. Primary end point was the occurrence of venous and arterial thrombotic events. Results: Patients with VTE secondary to COVID-19 had more frequent pulmonary embolism without deep vein thrombosis than controls (83.1% vs 46.2%, P <.001), lower prevalence of chronic inflammatory disease (1.4% and 16.3%, P <.001), and history of VTE (5.0% and 19.0%, P <.001). The median duration of anticoagulant treatment (194 and 225 days, P = 0.9) and the proportion of patients who discontinued anticoagulation (78.0% and 75.0%, P = 0.4) were similar between the 2 groups. Thrombotic event rates after discontinuation were 1.5 and 2.6 per 100 patient-years, respectively (P = 0.4). Conclusion: The risk of recurrent thrombotic events in patients with COVID-19-associated VTE is low and similar to the risk observed in patients with VTE secondary to hospitalization for other medical diseases.

Case report: Tissue positivity for SARS-CoV-2 in a preterm born infant death of thrombosis: possible intrauterine transmission.

Intrauterine transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2) is still matter of debate among scientists and there is limited information concerning this aspect of research. This could lead to severe complications of the growing fetus and, theoretically, of the newborn as well. We report the case of a male infant of 1,100 grams, born at 27th week of gestation to a SARS-CoV-2 mother, tested negative for viral detection at delivery. He was immediately admitted to neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for severe complications, where he died after 37 days by pulmonary embolism and thrombosis of the superior vena cava. After autopsy, SARS-CoV-2 N-protein and Spike RBD were detected in several tissues, particularly in the esophagus, stomach, spleen, and heart, with a significantly higher H-Score than the placenta. In conclusion, immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 NP and Spike RBD positivity in different tissues suggesting a possible intrauterine transmission. Newborn thrombo-embolism could be a complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection as observed in adult patients.

A closer look at the utilized radiation doses during computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for COVID-19 patients.

Introduction: CTPA stands for computed tomography pulmonary angiography. CTPA is an X-ray imaging that combines X-rays and computer technology to create detailed images of the pulmonary arteries and veins in the lungs. This test diagnoses and monitors conditions like pulmonary embolism, arterial blockages, and hypertension. Coronavirus (COVID-19) has threatened world health over the last three years. The number of (CT) scans increased and played a vital role in diagnosing COVID-19 patients, including life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to assess the radiation dose resulted from CTPA for COVID-19 patients. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from CTPA examinations on a single scanner in 84 symptomatic patients. The data collected included the dose length product (DLP), volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). The organ dose and effective dose were estimated using VirtualDose software. Results: The study population included 84 patients, 52% male and 48% female, with an average age of 62. The average DLP, CTDIvol, and SSDE were 404.2 mGy cm, 13.5 mGy, and 11.6 mGy\, respectively. The mean effective doses (mSv) for males and females were 3.01 and 3.29, respectively. The maximum to minimum organ doses (mGy) between patients was 0.8 for the male bladder and 7.33 for the female lung. Conclusions: The increase in CT scans during the COVID-19 pandemic required close dose monitoring and optimization. The protocol used during CTPA should guarantee a minimum radiation dose with maximum patient benefits.

Coagulopathy in Covid-19 patients an observational institutional study at MGMMC, Indore

Introduction- Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), first identified in Wuhan, China in December of 2019, has become a worldwide pandemic. It was declared by (WHO) World health organization as Public health emergency on 30th January 2020. Although respiratory compromise is the cardinal feature of the disease, early studies have suggested that elevated circulating D-dimer levels are associated with mortality, 1, 2 suggesting a distinct coagulation disorder associated with COVID-19 Materials And Methods- All patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed COVID-19 (defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test by nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab or sputum specimen) were included in the study. The incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients was assessed. Pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were confirmed radiographically. Results of 6 routinely drawn coagulation-based laboratory parameters (PT, international normalized ratio [INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], D-dimer, fibrinogen, and platelet count), 2 laboratory measures of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), were evaluated and compared between patients with thrombotic complications (composite of venous thromboembolism, arterial thromboembolism, and clinically significant non-vessel thrombotic complications), patients with bleeding complications, and patients without bleeding or thrombotic complications. Result- In this study, we report the haemostatic manifestations and bleeding and thrombotic complications of 100 COVID-19 patients. In a population managed with standard doses of prophylactic anticoagulation, we found a radiographically confirmed venous thromboembolic rate of 4.8% (7.6% in critically ill patients) Conclusion- In conclusion, we observed that COVID-19 was associated with similar rates of thrombosis and bleeding as seen in hospitalized patients with similar degrees of critical illness. Elevated D-dimer levels at initial presentation predicted bleeding complications, thrombotic complications, critical illness, and death. Beyond D-dimer, thrombosis was primarily associated with inflammatory markers rather than coagulation parameters. We additionally found that elevations in D-dimer on admission predicted critical illness and death, as well as bleeding and thrombotic complications. Inflammatory markers, including CRP and ESR, were also associated with thrombosis. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) is the property of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Thrombosis Occurrence in COVID-19 Compared With Other Infectious Causes of ARDS: A Contemporary Cohort.

Thrombosis occurrence in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been mostly compared to historical cohorts of patients with other respiratory infections. We retrospectively evaluated the thrombotic events that occurred in a contemporary cohort of patients hospitalized between March and July 2020 for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) according to the Berlin Definition and compared those with positive and negative real-time polymerase chain reaction results for wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) using descriptive analysis. The association between COVID-19 and thrombotic risk was evaluated using logistic regression. 264 COVID-19-positive (56.8% male, 59.0 years [IQR 48.6-69.7], Padua score on admission 3.0 [2.0-3.0]) and 88 COVID-19-negative patients (58.0% male, 63.7 years [51.2-73.5], Padua score 3.0 [2.0-5.0]) were included. 10.2% of non-COVID-19 and 8.7% of COVID-19 patients presented ≥ 1 clinically relevant thrombotic event confirmed by imaging exam. After adjustment for sex, Padua score, intensive care unit stay, thromboprophylaxis, and hospitalization length, the odds ratio for thrombosis in COVID-19 was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.30-1.64). We, therefore, conclude that infection-induced ARDS carries an inherent thrombotic risk, which was comparable between patients with COVID-19 and other respiratory infections in our contemporary cohort.